Yellow Bricks

by Duncan Epping

Storage

Why vSAN Max aka disaggregated storage?

· · 2 Comments

At VMware Explore 2024 in Las Vegas I had many customer meetings. Last year my calendar was also swamped and one of the things we spend a lot of time on was explaining to customers where vSAN Max would fit into the picture. vSAN Max was originally positioned as a “storage only vSAN platform for petabyte scale use cases”. I guess this still somewhat applies, but since then a lot has changed.

First, the vSAN Max ReadyNode configurations have changed substantially, and you can start at a much smaller capacity scale than when originally launched. We start at 20TB for an XS ReadyNode configuration, which means that with a 4 node minimum you have 80TB. That is something completely different then the petabytes we originally discussed. The other big difference is also the networking requirements, depending on the capacity needs, those have also come down substantially.

Now was said, originally the platform was positioned as a solution for customers running at petabyte scale. The reason I wanted to write a quick blog is because that is not the main argument today customers have for adopting vSAN Max or considering vSAN Max in their environment. The reason is something I personally did not expect to hear, but it is all about operations and sometimes politics.

Why vSAN Max aka disaggregated storage?

In a traditional environment, of course, depending on the size, you typically see a separation of duties. You have virtualization admins, networking admins, and storage admins. We have worked hard over the past decade to try to create these full-stack engineers, but the reality is that many companies still have these silos, and they will likely still exist 20 years from now.

This is where vSAN Max can help. The HCI model typically means that the virtualization administrator takes on the storage responsibilities when they implement vSAN, but with vSAN Max this doesn’t necessarily need to be the case. As various customers mentioned last week, with vSAN Max you could have a fully separated environment that is managed by a different team. Funny how often this was brought up as a great use case for vSAN. Especially with the amount of vSAN capacity included in VCF this makes more and more sense!

You could even have a different authentication service connected to the vCenter Server, which manages your vSAN Max clusters! You could have other types of hosts, cluster sizes, best practices, naming schemes, etc. This will all be up to the team managing that particular euuh silo. I know, sometimes a silo is seen as something negative, but for a lot of organizations, this is how they operate, and prefer to operate for the foreseeable future. If so, vSAN Max can cater for that use case as well!

vSAN Data Protection, what can you do with it today?

· · 10 Comments

Last week I posted a blog about how to get vSAN Data Protection up and running, but I never explained why you may want to do this in the first place? Before we dive into it, it probably is smart to also mention that vSAN Data Protection leverages the new snapshotting capability which is part of the vSAN Express Storage Architecture (vSAN ESA). vSAN ESA has a snapshotting capability that infinitely scales. It literally is 100x better than the snapshotting mechanism that is part of vSAN OSA. The reason for this is simple, with vSAN OSA (and VMFS for that matter) when you create a snapshot a new object is created and IO is redirected. With vSAN ESA we basically copy the meta data structure and keep using the existing objects for IO, which means we don’t need to traverse multiple files for reads for instance, and when we delete a snapshot we don’t need to copy data… As it is all about metadata changes / tracking.

Now in vSphere / vSAN 8.0 Update 3 we introduce a new capability called vSAN Data Protection. This provides you the ability to schedule snapshots, create immutable snapshots, clone snapshots, restore snapshots etc. All this through the vSphere Client interface, of which you can see an example below.

Now, in the above screenshot you see that half of the VMs are protected, and the other half is not. Why is that? Well, simply because I decided to only protect half of my VMs when I created my snapshot schedule. This is an “opt-in” mechanism, so you create a schedule, you decide which VMs are part of a schedule and which are not! Let’s take a look at the scheduling mechanism. You can find the mechanism at the cluster level under “Configuration -> vSAN -> Data Protection”. When you go there you see the above screen and you can click on “protection groups” and then “Create protection group”.

This will then present you a screen where you can define the name of the protection group, enable “immutability mode” and select the “Membership” of the protection group. Personally I like the Dynamic VM Patterns option. Just makes things easy. Like in this example as a pattern I used “*de*”, which means that all VMs with “de” in the name will be snapshotted whenever the schedule triggers a snaphot.

As mentioned, vSAN Data Protection includes ALL the virtual machines which match the pattern when the snapshot is taken. So if you create a schedule like for instance the following, it could take close to an hour before the VM is snapshotted for the very first time. If you feel this is too long then there’s of course also an option to manually snapshot the VM.

The schedules you can create can be really complex (up to 10 schedules), I just created an example of what is possible, but there’s many different options and combinations you can create. Note, a VM can be part of three different protection groups at most, and I also want to point out that the protection group is not a consistency group. Also note, you can have at most 200 snapshots per object/VM, so that is also something to take into consideration.

Now when the VMs are snapshotted you get a few extra options available, you have “snapshot management” at the VM level individually, and of course you can also manage things at the protection group level. You will see options like “restore” and “clone” and this is where it gets interesting, as this will allow you to go back to a particular point in time if needed from a particular snapshot, and also clone the VM from a particular snapshot. Why would you clone it? Well if you would want to test something against a specific dataset for instance, or if you want to do some type of digital forensics and analyze a VM for whatever reason.

One thing that is also good to mention is that with vSAN Data Protection, you can also recover VMs which have been deleted from vCenter Server. This is one of those must have features in my opinion, as this is one of those things that does occasionally happen, unfortunately. Power Off VM, delete … oops, wrong one! When it comes to the recovery of a VM, the process is just straight forward. You select the snapshot and click “restore VM”, or “clone VM”, depending on what you would expect as the outcome. Restore means the current instance is powered off, and the snapshot is the restore point when you power it on again. Of course, when you do a clone you simply get a second instance of that VM. Note that when  you create a clone, it is a linked clone, so it is extremely fast to instantiate.

The last thing I want to discuss is the immutability mode. I want to first caution people, this is what you think it is… it is IMMUTABLE! This means that you cannot delete the snapshots or change the schedule etc, let me quote the documentation:

Enable immutability mode on a protection group for additional security. You cannot edit or delete this protection group, change the VM membership, edit or delete snapshots. An immutable snapshot is a read-only copy of data that cannot be modified or deleted, even by an attacker with administrative privileges.

That is why I wanted to caution people, because if you create an immutable protection group with hundreds of VMs by accident… Yes, snapshots will be immutable, you cannot delete the protection group or the snapshots, or change the snapshot schedule. No, not even as an administrator. Do note, you can delete the VM if you want…

Anyway, I hope this gave a brief overview of what you can do with vSAN Data Protection at the moment. I’ll play around with it some more, and report back when there’s more to share 🙂

 

Where’s my vSAN Data Protection screen in 8.0 U3?

· · Leave a Comment

The first time I deployed vSphere/vSAN 8.0 U3 I immediately looked for the vSAN Data Protection UI. I always get excited about new features, and simply want to test it. I mean who doesn’t like scalable snapshots and a great way of managing snapshot schedules? Finally available within the vSphere Client! Of course, I could not find it, but I figured that was because I was on some weird alpha build of the product. Now that the product has shipped it must be there out of the box right?

No it isn’t. You will need to deploy an appliance in order for this functionality to appear in the UI. The appliance can be found under “Drivers and Tools” under the vSphere Hypervisor download (Which is under VMware vSphere), it is called “VMware vSAN Snapshot Service Appliance”. The current version is named “snapservice_appliance-8.0.3.0-24057802_OVF10.ova”. You need to deploy this OVA, and I would highly recommend to request a DNS name for it and have it properly registered. I fiddled around with the hosts file on VCSA and forgot to add the name to my local host file on my laptop and had some weird issues as a result, which I am trying to reproduce at the moment, will report back if/when I can.

The other thing to point out is the following, the documentation tells you to download the certs and copy the text for the Appliance, it isn’t something most of us do daily either, you can simply open a web browser and use the following url “https://<name of your vCenter server>/certs/download.zip” to download the certs and then unzip the downloaded file. (More details to be found here.) It will contain the certs, and if you open the cert with a proper text editor you can copy/paste that into the deployment screen for the OVA. (Yes, I know there are other ways as well, but I found this one to be the easiest.)

Now when you deployed the OVA, and when everything was configured correctly you should see a successful task, or actually two: download plugin, deploy plug, as shown in the next screenshot.

If you do get the “error downloading plug-in” error message, it likely is one of two things:

  1. DNS / Hosts files are not correctly configured, resulting in the URL not being reachable. Make sure you can resolve the URL!
  2. Cert thumbprint was incorrectly copied/pasted, there’s a whole section on troubleshooting this here.

Okay, now that I got the appliance up and running, I will probably do a follow-up post on what you can do with it 🙂

vSAN Stretched: Why is the witness not part of the cluster when the link between a data site and the witness fails?

· · Leave a Comment

Last week I received a question about vSAN Stretched which had me wondering for a while what on earth was going on. The person who asked this question was running through several failure scenarios, some of which I have also documented in the past here. The question I got is what is supposed to happen when I have the following scenario as shown in the diagram and the link between the preferred site (Site A) and the witness fails:

The answer, at least that is what I thought, was simple: All VMs will remain running, or said differently, there’s no impact on vSAN. While doing the test, indeed the outcome I documented, which is also documented in the Stretched Clustering Guide and the PoC Guide was indeed the same, the VMs remain running. However, one of the things that was noticed is that when this situation occurs, and indeed the connection between Site A and the Witness is lost, the witness is somehow no longer part of the cluster, which is not what I would expect. The reason I would not expect this to happen is because if a second failure would occur, and for instance the ISL between Site A and Site B goes down, it would direclty impact all VMs. At least, that is what I assumed.

However, when I triggered that second failure and I disconnected the ISL between Site A and Site B, I saw the witness re-appearing again immidiately, I saw the witness objects going from “absent” to “active”, and more importantly, all VMs remained running. The reason this happens is fairly straight forward, when running a configuration like this vSAN has a “leader” and a “backup”, and they each run in a seperate fault domain. Both the leader and the backup need to be able to communicate with the Witness for it to be able to function correctly. If the connection between Site A and the Witness is gone, then either the leader or the backup can no longer communicate with the Witness and the Witness is taken out of the cluster.

So why does the Witness return for duty when the second failure is triggered? Well, when the second failure is triggered the leader is restarted in Site B (as Site A is deemed lost), and the backup is already running in Site B. As both the leader and the backup can communicate again with the witness, the witness returns for duty and so will all of the components automatically and instantly. Which means that even though the ISL has failed between Site A and B after the witness was taken out of the cluster, all VMs remain accessible as the witness is reintroduced instantly to ensure availability of the workload. Pretty cool!  (Thanks to vSAN engineering for providing these insights on why this happens!)

Memory Tiering… Say what?!

· · Leave a Comment

Recently I presented a keynote at the Belgium VMUG, the topic was Innovation at VMware by Broadcom, but I guess I should say Innovation at Broadcom to be more accurate. During the keynote I briefly went over the process and the various types of innovation and what this can lead to. During the session, I discussed three projects, namely vSAN ESA, the Distributed Services Engine, and something which is being worked on called: Memory Tiering.

Memory Tiering is a very interesting concept that was first publicly discussed at Explore (or VMworld I guess it was still. called) a few years ago as a potential future feature. You may ask yourself why anyone would want to tier memory, as the impact from a performance stance can be significant. There are various reasons to do so, one of them being the cost of memory. Another problem the industry is facing is the fact that memory capacity (and performance) has not grown at the same rate as CPU capacity, which has resulted in many environments being memory-bound, differently said the imbalance between CPU and memory has increased substantially. That’s why VMware started Project Capitola.

When Project Capitola was discussed most of the focus was on Intel Optane, and most of us know what happened to that. I guess some assumed that that would also result in Project Capitola, or memory tiering and memory pooling technology, being scrapped. This is most definitely not the case, VMware has gone full steam ahead and has been discussing the progress in public, although you need to know where to look. If you listen to that session it is clear that there are various efforts, that would allow customers to tier memory in various ways, one of them being of course the various CXL based solutions that are coming to market now/soon.

One of which is memory tiering via a CXL accelerator card, basically an FPGA that has the sole purpose of increasing memory capacity, offload memory tiering and accelerating certain functionality where memory is crucial like for instance vMotion. As mentioned in the SNIA session, using an accelerator card can lead to a 30% reduction in migration times. An accelerator card like this will also open up other opportunities, like pooling memory for instance, which is something customers have been asking for since we created the concept of a cluster. Being able to share compute resources across hosts. Just imagine, your VM can use memory capacity available on another host without having to move the VM. Yes, before anyone comments on this, I do realize that this will have a significant performance impact potentially.

That is of course where the VMware logic comes into play. At VMworld in 2021 when Project Capitola was presented, the team also shared the performance results of recent tests, and it showed that the performance degradation was around 10% when 50% of DRAM was used and 50% of Optane memory. I was watching the SNIA session, and this demo shows the true power of VMware vSphere, memory tiering, and acceleration (Project Peaberry as it is called). On average the performance degradation was around 10%, yet roughly 40% of virtual memory was accessed via the Peaberry accelerator. Do note that the tiering is completely transparent to the application, this works for all different types of workloads out there. The crucial part here to understand is that because the hypervisor is already responsible for memory management, it knows which pages are hot and which pages are cold, that also means it can determine which pages it can move to a different tier while maintaining performance.

Anyway, I cannot reveal too much about what may, or may not, be coming in the future. What I can promise though is that I will make sure to write a blog as soon as I am allowed to talk about more details publicly, and I will probably also record a podcast with the product manager(s) when the time is there, so stay tuned!