• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Yellow Bricks

by Duncan Epping

  • Home
  • Unexplored Territory Podcast
  • HA Deepdive
  • ESXTOP
  • Stickers/Shirts
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Show Search
Hide Search

vSAN ESA and the minimum number of hosts with RAID-1/5/6

Duncan Epping · Jan 23, 2024 ·

I had a meeting last week with a customer and a question came up around the minimum number of hosts a cluster requires in order to use. particular RAID configuration for vSAN. I created a table for the customer and a quick paragraph on how this works and figured I would share it here as well.

With vSAN ESA VMware introduced a new feature called “Adaptive RAID-5”. I described this feature in this blog post here. In short, depending on the size of the cluster a RAID-5 configuration will either be a 2+1 scheme or a 4+1 scheme. There’s no longer a 3+1 scheme with vSAN ESA. Of course, there’s still the ability to use RAID-1 and RAID-6 as well, the RAID-1 and RAID-6 schemes remained unchanged.

When it comes to vSAN ESA, below are the number of hosts required for a particular RAID scheme. Do note, that with RAID-5, of the size of the cluster changes (higher of lower) then the scheme may also change as described in the linked article above.

 

Failures To TolerateObject ConfigurationMinimum number of hostsCapacity of VM size
No data redundancyRAID-01100%
1 Failure (Mirroring)RAID-13200%
1 Failure (Erasure Coding)RAID-5, 2+13150%
1 Failure (Erasure Coding)RAID-5, 4+16125%
2 Failures (Erasure Coding)RAID-6, 4+26150%
2 Failures (Mirorring) RAID-15300%
3 Failures (Mirorring)RAID-17400%

Related

Storage, vSAN esa, express storage architecture, vsan

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Olivier says

    23 January, 2024 at 18:31

    Can you explain why it is not possible to keep the 3+1 scheme for a 4-ESXi vSAN ESA cluster ? It will permit a “cost” of 133% instead 150% with the actuel 2+1 scheme….

    • Duncan Epping says

      25 January, 2024 at 10:34

      Theoretically that should indeed be possible, but the team decided to create a different implementation based on what customers asked for. I am happy to ask them to see if it is possible to also implement 3+1.

  2. Jimmy says

    8 May, 2024 at 06:01

    Hey Duncan. How did you go with this?

    I think there will be a lot of people out there trying to best configure a 4-node ESA cluster.

    To me neither RAID5 2+1 or RAID1 2+2 look ideal.
    Surely the best would be either RAID5 3+1 or maybe even RAID6 2+2?

  3. Dan says

    24 September, 2024 at 19:55

    For the 5 node FTT2 RAID1, Can you also do 4+Witness?

    • Duncan Epping says

      25 September, 2024 at 11:36

      A dedicated witness node can only be used when you have a stretched cluster configuration currently.

  4. Joshua says

    18 February, 2025 at 18:06

    Hi Duncan,

    Firstly thank you for the above information.

    I just had a couple of questions.

    How does this work over a stretched cluster?
    What is the minimum number of hosts per site?
    What would the scheme be if for example I had 4 hosts at each site.

    Thank you in advance.

Primary Sidebar

About the Author

Duncan Epping is a Chief Technologist and Distinguished Engineering Architect at Broadcom. Besides writing on Yellow-Bricks, Duncan is the co-author of the vSAN Deep Dive and the vSphere Clustering Deep Dive book series. Duncan is also the host of the Unexplored Territory Podcast.

Follow Us

  • X
  • Spotify
  • RSS Feed
  • LinkedIn

Recommended Book(s)

Advertisements




Copyright Yellow-Bricks.com © 2025 · Log in