• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Yellow Bricks

by Duncan Epping

  • Home
  • ESXTOP
  • Stickers/Shirts
  • Privacy Policy
  • About
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Migration will cause the virtual machine’s configuration to be modified

Duncan Epping · Jan 2, 2008 ·

When live migrating from ESX 3.0.2 to ESX 3.5 VMware gives an error:”Migration will cause the virtual machine’s configuration to be modified, to preserve the CPU feature requirements for its guest OS.” This error indicates that the .vmx file is about to be changed.


In my case VMware added the following bit:

cpuid.1.eax = “xxxx————xx————–”
cpuid.1.ecx = “——–R–RR——————-”
cpuid.1.edx = “—————————T—-”
cpuid.80000001.eax.amd = “xxxx————xx————–”
cpuid.80000001.ecx.amd = “—————————-0—”
cpuid.80000001.edx = “——————–H———–”
cpuid.80000001.edx.amd = “—–R————–H——T—-“

This CPU masking surprised me because both Servers are completely the same. Than again ESX 3.5 contains Paravirtualization and Virtualized MMU, and I can image that this functionality is exposed to the VCPU and doesn’t need to be exposed in ESX 3.0.2. Anyone else any thoughts on this?

Share it:

  • Tweet

Related

Server 3.0.x, 3.5, ESX, vm, vmotion, VMware

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. William Patton says

    8 January, 2008 at 00:37

    I am looking at the same error tonight using VMotion between 3.0.1 and 3.0.2 identical servers. They have identical hardware for VMotion specifically, and this error surprised me.

    Any thoughts on 3.0.1 -> 3.0.2 with this error, or any further information on 3.0.2 -> 3.0.5 with this error?

  2. John Gallucci says

    23 January, 2008 at 04:07

    I ran into the exact same problem as well. It occurs for me during both Cold and Live Migration. That paravirtualization in ESX 3.5 is causing this issue is a good assumption, although having trouble finding it in any documentation. A good sign of this is the fact that my Windows VM left the CPU flags all empty, as previously with ESX 3.0.2, but it changes for all my Linux ones.

    Another issue I am having is that some of my RHEL 4 (32-bit) virtual machines fail to boot, giving the error message “Your CPU does not support long mode. Use a 32bit distribution”. I believe this might be because some of my linux VMs were stored on an AMD server with ESX 3.0.1 and I am moving to an Intel Server with 3.5.

    I would write more but I am still trying to figure this one out. From what I can see is that you must upgrade AMD and Intel hosts to the same version (in this case ESX 3.5) or else Cold migrations will fail or the OS won’t boot.

  3. John Gallucci says

    23 January, 2008 at 22:42

    Problem solved. For some reason my Virtual Machines were labeled as 32-bit OS, when actually they had a 64-bit OS installed. This still creates a warning however when you migrade from 3.0.2 to 3.5. I believe this is neccessary because of the changes to ESX in order for paravirtualization to occur.

    I have found out that when in doubt reset the advanced CPU configs to default. Keep in mind that the warning messages will reappear if you migrage accross different versions of ESX again.

  4. Duncan Epping says

    23 January, 2008 at 23:20

    That’s weird. But resetting is fine indeed if you don’t cross migrate… In noticed the same.

  5. Joshua says

    31 March, 2008 at 16:54

    Hey folks, I ran into this same problem migrating 3.0.2 guests to 3.5. In my case, when 3.5 was installed, it apparently changed the CPU description from “Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8220 SE” to “Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 8220”. It may be unrelated as my 3.5 host was a new server. After I upgrade one of my existing 3.0.2’s to 3.5, we’ll see if it modifies the CPU type again.

    Cheers

  6. KIM says

    27 May, 2008 at 01:39

    This caused a Solaris 10 VM to panic every bootup. Turns out the CPU Mask added by 3.5 caused this the next time that VM was power cycled (many weeks after the 3.5 upgrade) Removing the mask fixed the VM, adding the mask breaks it again. So VMWARE are looking at that.

    Nasty!

  7. Mick says

    2 July, 2008 at 04:41

    I’m also getting the error:”Migration will cause the virtual machine’s configuration to be modified, to preserve the CPU feature requirements for its guest OS.”

    However, both machines involved are identical servers, both with Intel Xeon E5345 2.33 Ghz processors. The only difference is I server is running 3.5, the other is 3.0.1

    will the migration be successful.

  8. Duncan says

    2 July, 2008 at 11:54

    No problem, migration will be successful. But the CPU mask will change, I can imagine you would want to revert that when all hosts are upgraded.

  9. Sascha Reuter says

    21 July, 2008 at 14:55

    I have also this problem, but with migration between physically identical ESX 3.5u1 hosts.
    One has the patches up until April 2008, the other has the patches up until June 2008.
    Can a VMWare microcode in one of the patches update cause this behaviour?

  10. Steven Johnston says

    28 July, 2008 at 14:50

    I just got this between an ESX 3.5u1 and an ESX 3.5u2 host during VMotion. There is a similar sort of change to above but with 10 more lines (I have taken out the number between the “”, it is 32 characters long). See below.

    hostCPUID.0 = “”
    guestCPUID.0 = “”
    userCPUID.0 = “”
    hostCPUID.1 = “”
    guestCPUID.1 = “”
    userCPUID.1 = “”
    hostCPUID.80000001 = “”
    guestCPUID.80000001 = “”
    userCPUID.80000001 = “”
    evcCompatibilityMode = “FALSE”

Primary Sidebar

About the author

Duncan Epping is a Chief Technologist in the Office of CTO of the Cloud Platform BU at VMware. He is a VCDX (# 007), the author of the "vSAN Deep Dive", the “vSphere Clustering Technical Deep Dive” series, and the host of the "Unexplored Territory" podcast.

Upcoming Events

29-08-2022 – VMware Explore US
07-11-2022 – VMware Explore EMEA
….

Recommended Reads

Sponsors

Want to support Yellow-Bricks? Buy an advert!

Advertisements

Copyright Yellow-Bricks.com © 2022 · Log in