I just upgraded to WordPress 2.5. Very easy as expected and it the admin pages look amazing, still have to find my way through but I think it definitely is an improvement. Only thing that seems to be missing still is a decent “tag” option, would be easy if I could just pick the already used tags again…
Weird scripted install problems
Today I was testing a scripted installation for a customer. All day long I had weird problems with the script. But whenever I reviewed my script their seemed to be nothing wrong with it. I wrote the scripts with Notepad++ and double checked them with vi and nano. You can imagine I almost threw my laptop out the window of sheer frustration. Notepad++ has a function called “convert to unix format” and although I could not find any weird characters, returns of whatsoever… it did solve my problem. After having a closer look at Notepad++ it seems like there’s a setting to avoid this behaviour:
I should have known it isn’t a good idea to edit linux script files on a Windows host, if only VMware would release a linux version of the VirtualCenter client…
Support for Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) in 3.5 update !
I received an email stating the following:
Microsoft Cluster Server is supported with VMware ESX 3.5 Update 1. Support is similar to ESX 3.0.1 with the following additions:
- Both 64 bit and 32 bit Windows 2003 guests are supported with MSCS.
- Boot from SAN for VMs using MSCS is now supported.
- Majority Node Set clusters with application-level replication (for example, Microsoft Exchange 2007 Cluster Continuous Replication (CCR)) is now supported.
For details regarding MSCS support, including a number of important restrictions, please see the document “Setup for Microsoft Cluster Service.” For information concerning supported storage arrays, refer to the Storage/SAN Compatibility Guide for ESX Server 3.5 and ESX Server 3i.
load balancing active/active SAN’s
Ernst, a regular poster of the Dutch VMug, posted a script for load balancing paths to an active/active SAN. What it does is select the next path for a LUN, in other words if there are four paths LUN1 will be reached via Path1, LUN2 via Path2 etc.
The script, also available for download here:
#!/bin/bash
for PATHS in 2 4 6 8
do
STPATHS=${PATHS}
COUNTER=”1″for LUN in $(esxcfg-mpath -l | grep “has ${STPATHS} paths” | awk ‘{print $2}’)
do
esxcfg-mpath –lun=${LUN} –path=$(esxcfg-mpath -q –lun=${LUN} | grep FC | awk ‘{print $4}’ | awk ‘{print NR “S\t ” $0}’ | grep ${COUNTER}S | awk ‘{print $2}’) –preferred
COUNT=`expr ${COUNTER} + 1`
COUNTER=${COUNT}
if [[ ${COUNTER} -gt ${STPATHS} ]]
then
COUNTER=”1″
fi
done
done
This will result in the following outcome with “esxcfg-mpath -l”:
Disk vmhba2:1:4 /dev/sdh (512000MB) has 4 paths and policy of Fixed
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e812 vmhba2:1:4 On active preferred
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e873 vmhba2:2:4 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e802 vmhba4:1:4 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e863 vmhba4:2:4 OnDisk vmhba2:1:5 /dev/sdi (512000MB) has 4 paths and policy of Fixed
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e812 vmhba2:1:5 On
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e873 vmhba2:2:5 On active preferred
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e802 vmhba4:1:5 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e863 vmhba4:2:5 OnDisk vmhba2:1:6 /dev/sdj (307200MB) has 4 paths and policy of Fixed
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e812 vmhba2:1:6 On
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e873 vmhba2:2:6 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e802 vmhba4:1:6 On active preferred
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e863 vmhba4:2:6 OnDisk vmhba2:1:7 /dev/sdk (307200MB) has 4 paths and policy of Fixed
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e812 vmhba2:1:7 On
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e873 vmhba2:2:7 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e802 vmhba4:1:7 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e863 vmhba4:2:7 On active preferredDisk vmhba2:1:8 /dev/sdl (512000MB) has 4 paths and policy of Fixed
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e812 vmhba2:1:8 On active preferred
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e873 vmhba2:2:8 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e802 vmhba4:1:8 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e863 vmhba4:2:8 OnDisk vmhba2:1:9 /dev/sdm (512000MB) has 4 paths and policy of Fixed
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e812 vmhba2:1:9 On
FC 16:0.1 50060b0000646c8a<->50060e8004f2e873 vmhba2:2:9 On active preferred
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e802 vmhba4:1:9 On
FC 19:0.1 50060b0000646062<->50060e8004f2e863 vmhba4:2:9 OnIn other words, when you run this script each LUN will be addressed via a specific path and all HBA’s and SAN Disk Controllers will be used instead of the default first path / first controller policy. This will result in a better performance and distribution of load on the SAN Disk Controllers.
Update Manager: Metadata for patch missing
Today I noticed the following error at a customer site when I wanted to install the new patch bundle, “Metadata for patch missing”. After a close inspection I noticed VirtualCenter was installed with a different http port number. For VMware Update Manager to work you will have to open up the firewall manually:
esxcfg-firewall -o 81,tcp,out,UpdateManager
(Change the port number, in red, according to the used portnumber for VirtualCenter.)