<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HA and Slot sizes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/</link>
	<description>Building blocks for virtualization...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:50:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4698</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 21:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4698</guid>
		<description>thanks, Duncan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks, Duncan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Epping</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4670</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Epping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4670</guid>
		<description>no they do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no they do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4378</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4378</guid>
		<description>so reservations at resource pool level do not affect failover capacity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so reservations at resource pool level do not affect failover capacity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Epping</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4374</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Epping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4374</guid>
		<description>Yes it will avoid these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it will avoid these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4373</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4373</guid>
		<description>5. Suttoi said, August 17th, 2009 at 08:12 If you pool servers by service / application and give them no direct reservation, but instead make a reservation at the resource pool level, will this avoid admission control problems?


can someone answer the question?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5. Suttoi said, August 17th, 2009 at 08:12 If you pool servers by service / application and give them no direct reservation, but instead make a reservation at the resource pool level, will this avoid admission control problems?</p>
<p>can someone answer the question?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suttoi</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4332</link>
		<dc:creator>Suttoi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4332</guid>
		<description>If you pool servers by service / application and give them no direct reservation, but instead make a reservation at the resource pool level, will this avoid admission control problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you pool servers by service / application and give them no direct reservation, but instead make a reservation at the resource pool level, will this avoid admission control problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 04:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s not the best but the least restrictive. the best is when you are using a realistic reservation on at least one machine so that the slots are correctly sized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s not the best but the least restrictive. the best is when you are using a realistic reservation on at least one machine so that the slots are correctly sized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NiTRo</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4319</link>
		<dc:creator>NiTRo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4319</guid>
		<description>So the best case Is when no vm in the cluster has reservation ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the best case Is when no vm in the cluster has reservation ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Wegner</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Wegner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>oops, not &quot;increase slot size&quot; but &quot;increase failover capacity&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, not &#8220;increase slot size&#8221; but &#8220;increase failover capacity&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Wegner</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/08/12/ha-and-slot-sizes/comment-page-1/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Wegner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3656#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>If you do not want to tweak advanced parameters you could also check if you really need the large exceptional reservations. Reducing the reservation will also increase the HA slot size. One example I know: a single VM with 40 GB memory reservation crippled HA (failover capacity = 0), setting the reservation to 10 GB helped a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you do not want to tweak advanced parameters you could also check if you really need the large exceptional reservations. Reducing the reservation will also increase the HA slot size. One example I know: a single VM with 40 GB memory reservation crippled HA (failover capacity = 0), setting the reservation to 10 GB helped a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
