<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Max amount of VMs per VMFS volume</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/07/07/max-amount-of-vms-per-vmfs-volume/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/07/07/max-amount-of-vms-per-vmfs-volume/</link>
	<description>Building blocks for virtualization...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 19:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: hphuhtin</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/07/07/max-amount-of-vms-per-vmfs-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-5384</link>
		<dc:creator>hphuhtin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3371#comment-5384</guid>
		<description>LUN != VMFS. What if you use multiple LUNs and extents to create one VMFS?

There are cases where this would be beneficial. For instance Lab Manager environment, where the linked clones can be created only within one VMFS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LUN != VMFS. What if you use multiple LUNs and extents to create one VMFS?</p>
<p>There are cases where this would be beneficial. For instance Lab Manager environment, where the linked clones can be created only within one VMFS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satyam Vaghani</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/07/07/max-amount-of-vms-per-vmfs-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-4049</link>
		<dc:creator>Satyam Vaghani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 23:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3371#comment-4049</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, 3011 is not a literal maximum. But now that the cat is out, it is the maximum number we tried at the time of releasing ESX3.0.0 before we ran out of hardware and interest (and it was getting really late for dinner).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, 3011 is not a literal maximum. But now that the cat is out, it is the maximum number we tried at the time of releasing ESX3.0.0 before we ran out of hardware and interest (and it was getting really late for dinner).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vaughn</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/07/07/max-amount-of-vms-per-vmfs-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-3977</link>
		<dc:creator>Vaughn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3371#comment-3977</guid>
		<description>Per the norm, great post!  VM to datastore density can be a huge challenge if you have &gt;100 VMs.  In addition the number of datstores one has can impact others areas of operations including storage provisioning, D2D backup, and data replication.

I guess there&#039;s no free lunch.  If the storage architecture is ham strung with a shallow queue depth than it must be taken into consideration with the architecture design.

Once you get your NetApp systems setup maybe you can repeat this discussion considering NFS as the storage protocol for accessing general purpose shared storage pools.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Per the norm, great post!  VM to datastore density can be a huge challenge if you have &gt;100 VMs.  In addition the number of datstores one has can impact others areas of operations including storage provisioning, D2D backup, and data replication.</p>
<p>I guess there&#8217;s no free lunch.  If the storage architecture is ham strung with a shallow queue depth than it must be taken into consideration with the architecture design.</p>
<p>Once you get your NetApp systems setup maybe you can repeat this discussion considering NFS as the storage protocol for accessing general purpose shared storage pools.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirtualGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/07/07/max-amount-of-vms-per-vmfs-volume/comment-page-1/#comment-3974</link>
		<dc:creator>VirtualGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=3371#comment-3974</guid>
		<description>There actually is a literal maximum, which is 3011, which is obviously stupid high :-)

Your logic is right on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There actually is a literal maximum, which is 3011, which is obviously stupid high <img src='http://www.yellow-bricks.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Your logic is right on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
