<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMFS recognized as a snapshot what to do? Exploring the next version of ESX&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/13/vmfs-recognized-as-a-snapshot-what-to-do-exploringthe-next-version-of-esx/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/13/vmfs-recognized-as-a-snapshot-what-to-do-exploringthe-next-version-of-esx/</link>
	<description>Building blocks for virtualization...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:18:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Traveller</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/13/vmfs-recognized-as-a-snapshot-what-to-do-exploringthe-next-version-of-esx/comment-page-1/#comment-3869</link>
		<dc:creator>Traveller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=2319#comment-3869</guid>
		<description>After using the command on our ESX servers we found that the -M (persistant) is not persistant over reboots OR standby.  
If we used the -m option the filesystem would suddenly dissapear if there were no active VM&#039;s using it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After using the command on our ESX servers we found that the -M (persistant) is not persistant over reboots OR standby.<br />
If we used the -m option the filesystem would suddenly dissapear if there were no active VM&#8217;s using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Troyer</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/13/vmfs-recognized-as-a-snapshot-what-to-do-exploringthe-next-version-of-esx/comment-page-1/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>John Troyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 20:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=2319#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>As long as it was talked about or lab-accessible at VMworld Europe, it is ok to talk about. I realize that&#039;s a pretty fuzzy line, especially if you weren&#039;t at VMworld.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as it was talked about or lab-accessible at VMworld Europe, it is ok to talk about. I realize that&#8217;s a pretty fuzzy line, especially if you weren&#8217;t at VMworld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonya</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/13/vmfs-recognized-as-a-snapshot-what-to-do-exploringthe-next-version-of-esx/comment-page-1/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>anonya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=2319#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>NDA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NDA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouke Groenescheij</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2009/03/13/vmfs-recognized-as-a-snapshot-what-to-do-exploringthe-next-version-of-esx/comment-page-1/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>Bouke Groenescheij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=2319#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>Nice post! Isn&#039;t this on the edge of NDA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post! Isn&#8217;t this on the edge of NDA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
