<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HA, primary and secondary nodes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/</link>
	<description>Building blocks for virtualization...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:03:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: High Availability &#171; UP2V</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-2402</link>
		<dc:creator>High Availability &#171; UP2V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-2402</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LucD</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-2022</link>
		<dc:creator>LucD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-2022</guid>
		<description>Do you happen to know where (which log) you can see if a re-election has taken place ?

My idea was to use the ReconfigureComputeResource method to force a re-election after a 1 or more host failures.

This could be done like this (PowerShell-VITK)

$clus = Get-View -Id (Get-Cluster ).Id
$clsConfigInfoEx = New-Object VMware.Vim.ClusterConfigSpecEx
$clsConfigInfoEx.DasConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DasConfig
$clsConfigInfoEx.DpmConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DpmConfig
$clsConfigInfoEx.DrsConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DrsConfig
$clsConfigInfoEx.DpmConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DpmConfig

$clus.ReconfigureComputeResource($clsConfigInfoEx, $true)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you happen to know where (which log) you can see if a re-election has taken place ?</p>
<p>My idea was to use the ReconfigureComputeResource method to force a re-election after a 1 or more host failures.</p>
<p>This could be done like this (PowerShell-VITK)</p>
<p>$clus = Get-View -Id (Get-Cluster ).Id<br />
$clsConfigInfoEx = New-Object VMware.Vim.ClusterConfigSpecEx<br />
$clsConfigInfoEx.DasConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DasConfig<br />
$clsConfigInfoEx.DpmConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DpmConfig<br />
$clsConfigInfoEx.DrsConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DrsConfig<br />
$clsConfigInfoEx.DpmConfig = $clus.ConfigurationEx.DpmConfig</p>
<p>$clus.ReconfigureComputeResource($clsConfigInfoEx, $true)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to check which is your Primary node in HA ? &#171; Lets Design, Implement and do Administration of ESX3</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>How to check which is your Primary node in HA ? &#171; Lets Design, Implement and do Administration of ESX3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>[...] Courtesy: Yellow Bricks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Courtesy: Yellow Bricks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Epping</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1093</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Epping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1093</guid>
		<description>well around once every two months or so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well around once every two months or so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1092</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1092</guid>
		<description>Duncan, after upgrading to 2.5 U2 and dropping all the old performance data that wasn&#039;t rolling up life seems to be much better. I was about ready to open an SR around it but how often do you really put hosts in M mode? 
Thanks for the feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, after upgrading to 2.5 U2 and dropping all the old performance data that wasn&#8217;t rolling up life seems to be much better. I was about ready to open an SR around it but how often do you really put hosts in M mode?<br />
Thanks for the feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Epping</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1090</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Epping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1090</guid>
		<description>@ Alastair, every node up til 5 becomes primary!

@ Bouke, that&#039;s a great compliment from the Guru that got me enthusiastic about VMware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Alastair, every node up til 5 becomes primary!</p>
<p>@ Bouke, that&#8217;s a great compliment from the Guru that got me enthusiastic about VMware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bouke Groenescheij</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Bouke Groenescheij</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 08:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>As always, excellent and spot-on info! Great job Duncan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, excellent and spot-on info! Great job Duncan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1085</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1085</guid>
		<description>I had understood that the number of primary nodes was the configured host failure number plus one, up to a maximum of five.
i.e. in a ten node cluster with configured failure level of 1 there would be only two primaries.
Does this differ from your understanding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had understood that the number of primary nodes was the configured host failure number plus one, up to a maximum of five.<br />
i.e. in a ten node cluster with configured failure level of 1 there would be only two primaries.<br />
Does this differ from your understanding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Epping</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1083</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Epping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1083</guid>
		<description>@chris:
1) that totally depends on the infrastructural design, stuff like network link. I&#039;ve setup both variations and actually don&#039;t have one that I prefer more... I always have the feeling that it&#039;s safer to have 2 clusters, one at each site.
2) try: 
&quot;more /opt/LGTOaam512/log/aam_config_util_listnodes.log&quot;
or
&quot;more /var/log/vmware/aam/aam_config_util_listnodes.log&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@chris:<br />
1) that totally depends on the infrastructural design, stuff like network link. I&#8217;ve setup both variations and actually don&#8217;t have one that I prefer more&#8230; I always have the feeling that it&#8217;s safer to have 2 clusters, one at each site.<br />
2) try:<br />
&#8220;more /opt/LGTOaam512/log/aam_config_util_listnodes.log&#8221;<br />
or<br />
&#8220;more /var/log/vmware/aam/aam_config_util_listnodes.log&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Epping</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/09/09/ha-primary-and-secondary-nodes/comment-page-1/#comment-1082</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Epping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 14:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=450#comment-1082</guid>
		<description>@ john:
1st question: I would suppose number of nodes in a cluster because all the resource state data needs to go around.
2nd question: this is awkward behavior that I haven&#039;t seen personally. you should definitely check your log files and check for any weird messages regarding this. I would recommend with posting a question on VMTN and phone VMware support. I heard a case like this once and it had to do with zoning on the SAN.
3rd questions: it&#039;s currently not possible to have different ip networks for the SC in the same cluster</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ john:<br />
1st question: I would suppose number of nodes in a cluster because all the resource state data needs to go around.<br />
2nd question: this is awkward behavior that I haven&#8217;t seen personally. you should definitely check your log files and check for any weird messages regarding this. I would recommend with posting a question on VMTN and phone VMware support. I heard a case like this once and it had to do with zoning on the SAN.<br />
3rd questions: it&#8217;s currently not possible to have different ip networks for the SC in the same cluster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
