Comments on: VC 2.5 HA constraints http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/05/20/vc-25-ha-constraints/ Building blocks for virtualization... Tue, 16 Mar 2010 00:34:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Virtualization Short Take #9 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/05/20/vc-25-ha-constraints/comment-page-1/#comment-553 Virtualization Short Take #9 - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers Sat, 31 May 2008 22:31:32 +0000 http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=183#comment-553 [...] points out a VMTN thread regarding VMware HA behaviors in “heterogeneous” clusters, i.e., clusters that include 1/2 vCPU [...] [...] points out a VMTN thread regarding VMware HA behaviors in “heterogeneous” clusters, i.e., clusters that include 1/2 vCPU [...]

]]> By: Duncan Epping http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/05/20/vc-25-ha-constraints/comment-page-1/#comment-540 Duncan Epping Tue, 20 May 2008 19:31:00 +0000 http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=183#comment-540 indeed, if you set it to "allow constraint violation" than it will definitely work. indeed, if you set it to “allow constraint violation” than it will definitely work.

]]> By: Carlo Costanzo http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/05/20/vc-25-ha-constraints/comment-page-1/#comment-539 Carlo Costanzo Tue, 20 May 2008 17:52:35 +0000 http://www.yellow-bricks.com/?p=183#comment-539 Does that mean that if you were to change the HA admission control to 'Allow VMs to Violate', this would not have been a problem? Most of my clients are more concerned during a failure to 'get it back up' rather than performance. Carlo. Does that mean that if you were to change the HA admission control to ‘Allow VMs to Violate’, this would not have been a problem? Most of my clients are more concerned during a failure to ‘get it back up’ rather than performance.

Carlo.

]]>