<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtualizing Citrix?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/</link>
	<description>Building blocks for virtualization...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 21:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>I have been virtualizing Citrix servers a f500 client in Chicago for years.  They run decent, unless you are doing java development, in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been virtualizing Citrix servers a f500 client in Chicago for years.  They run decent, unless you are doing java development, in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Boche</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Boche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>I updated my VMTN Community post on 3/26 adding the bit that VMware confirmed with me that Content-Based Page Sharing functions both inter and intra VM.

http://communities.vmware.com/message/863663</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I updated my VMTN Community post on 3/26 adding the bit that VMware confirmed with me that Content-Based Page Sharing functions both inter and intra VM.</p>
<p><a href="http://communities.vmware.com/message/863663" rel="nofollow">http://communities.vmware.com/message/863663</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viktor</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Viktor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hi Duncan, I think you should check the links to the various articles. It seems they are all linked to the same article…&quot;

Sorry, this reply is related to the  &quot;Overcommiting memory, the war is on…&quot;article :S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hi Duncan, I think you should check the links to the various articles. It seems they are all linked to the same article…&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, this reply is related to the  &#8220;Overcommiting memory, the war is on…&#8221;article :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viktor</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Viktor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 07:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Hi Duncan, I think you should check the links to the various articles. It seems they are all linked to the same article...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Duncan, I think you should check the links to the various articles. It seems they are all linked to the same article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More on Memory Overcommitment - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>More on Memory Overcommitment - blog.scottlowe.org - The weblog of an IT pro specializing in virtualization, storage, and servers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>[...] commenter apparently also started a VMware Communities thread which was, in turn, the basis for this article by Duncan over at Yellow Bricks. My, what a tangled web we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] commenter apparently also started a VMware Communities thread which was, in turn, the basis for this article by Duncan over at Yellow Bricks. My, what a tangled web we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtualizing Citrix?! &#124; digipulse.nl</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-368</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtualizing Citrix?! &#124; digipulse.nl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-368</guid>
		<description>[...] Yellow-Bricks.com posted an nice article today over how to virtualize Citrix servers in VMWare. Everybody knows the discussion wether to virtualize Citrix servers or not. Read the article here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yellow-Bricks.com posted an nice article today over how to virtualize Citrix servers in VMWare. Everybody knows the discussion wether to virtualize Citrix servers or not. Read the article here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fredrick</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-367</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fredrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-367</guid>
		<description>Use SWsoft, now called Parallels, os virtualization solution called, Virtuozzo.  It will give you much better performance than hypervisor based virtualization, no matter what</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Use SWsoft, now called Parallels, os virtualization solution called, Virtuozzo.  It will give you much better performance than hypervisor based virtualization, no matter what</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Flanagan</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Flanagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 16:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/18/virtualizing-citrix/#comment-365</guid>
		<description>The next release of XenServer 4.1 has a new template specifically designed for Citrix Presentation Server (now called XenApp). We have seen some impressive improvements in scalability with this template.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next release of XenServer 4.1 has a new template specifically designed for Citrix Presentation Server (now called XenApp). We have seen some impressive improvements in scalability with this template.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
