<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VMworld, the aftermath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/</link>
	<description>Building blocks for virtualization...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Ozone</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Ozone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 15:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;VMworld Europe 2008 round-up...&lt;/strong&gt;

In February 26-28 VMware hosted the first European edition of its VMworld conference and immediately...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>VMworld Europe 2008 round-up&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In February 26-28 VMware hosted the first European edition of its VMworld conference and immediately&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virtual Enthusiasm</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Virtual Enthusiasm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/#comment-310</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Duncan Reports on VMWorld 2008 Europe...&lt;/strong&gt;

Well know VMware Guru, Duncan Epping, posted up a report on his site Yellow Bricks about some of what he took in at VMWorld Europe 2008. He covered several aspects that I am very interested in myself and has interesting takes on what he saw. &#160;Here...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Duncan Reports on VMWorld 2008 Europe&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Well know VMware Guru, Duncan Epping, posted up a report on his site Yellow Bricks about some of what he took in at VMWorld Europe 2008. He covered several aspects that I am very interested in myself and has interesting takes on what he saw. &nbsp;Here&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remco</title>
		<link>http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Remco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 09:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yellow-bricks.com/2008/03/01/vmworld-the-aftermath/#comment-305</guid>
		<description>I agree with Duncan, VMworld offered al lot of promising techniques and the demos  were great! We work alot on SAN site failover at our customer premises and it took days, al least, to do all the scripting and testing (both technical and procedural) with VI-3 combined with the different SAN vendors. 

For me Site Recovery Manager will be a very appreciated piece of software to do all this work in less time. Even the testing.... However, as Duncan stated,  a fail-back option would be much appreciated...

At the moment Site Recovery manager is tested and qualified for a few SAN vendors, and that should change in the next couple of weeks/months...

VDM was another cool solution. This solution, which was demonstrated to Duncan and me at the VMware booth in the Solutions Exchange area, can be implemented for quit a few of our customers. 

grtz

remco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Duncan, VMworld offered al lot of promising techniques and the demos  were great! We work alot on SAN site failover at our customer premises and it took days, al least, to do all the scripting and testing (both technical and procedural) with VI-3 combined with the different SAN vendors. </p>
<p>For me Site Recovery Manager will be a very appreciated piece of software to do all this work in less time. Even the testing&#8230;. However, as Duncan stated,  a fail-back option would be much appreciated&#8230;</p>
<p>At the moment Site Recovery manager is tested and qualified for a few SAN vendors, and that should change in the next couple of weeks/months&#8230;</p>
<p>VDM was another cool solution. This solution, which was demonstrated to Duncan and me at the VMware booth in the Solutions Exchange area, can be implemented for quit a few of our customers. </p>
<p>grtz</p>
<p>remco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
